Kevin Pietersen the only winner if England lose the plot

 
p67 England's Kevin Pietersen walks back to the Pavillion following his dismissal for 42 runs during the first day of the first international Test cricket match between England and South Africa at the Oval in London on July 19, 2012. AFP PHOTO / IAN KINGTON RESTRICTED TO EDITORIAL USE. NO ASSOCIATION WITH DIRECT COMPETITOR OF SPONSOR, PARTNER, OR SUPPLIER OF THE ECB
IAN KINGTON/AFP/Getty Images
Stephen Brenkley27 September 2012

The Kevin Pietersen Show is back in town. It never left, in truth, though it has gone dark sometimes lately as both sides in the shemozzle sought the sanctuary of privacy to try to reach a resolution.

They may or may not be closer to doing so. It depends whose off-the-record briefings, if they exist, you listen to and whose Twitter accounts you follow. But a new sense of urgency has entered proceedings.

Pietersen’s England contract ends on 30 September, after which he is a free agent. He can then do what he jolly well wants and play for whom he jolly well likes (as opposed, of course, to having do as he is told under the terms of the central contract).

Speculation about his intentions will intensify, particularly with regard to the Big Bash, the Australian domestic Twenty20 competition where clubs have made it clear that they would be prepared to pay big bucks.

England’s performances in Sri Lanka are bound to have some influence. As every cross-batted swipe against India last weekend led to disaster his kudos grew, his own travails against spin forgotten.

If England continue to play like clowns, then the mood towards Pietersen may swing further especially if he continues to charm as a TV pundit here. The position of the coach, Andy Flower, will deservedly be scrutinised.

Indeed, on Twitter, Piers Morgan, Pietersen’s most high-profile supporter, said Flower was running a “ridiculous ego-trip campaign against KP”. But Morgan may not be helping.

The twittersphere is still showing around 80 per cent feeling against Pietersen. Everybody knows that England would be a better team with Pietersen in it. But that hardly matters. None of the discussions has been about Pietersen’s ability. He is a good batsman who plays great innings, not a great batsman.

In general, the talks have been about trust. England feel Pietersen breached it and it will not be regained easily, if ever.

Create a FREE account to continue reading

eros

Registration is a free and easy way to support our journalism.

Join our community where you can: comment on stories; sign up to newsletters; enter competitions and access content on our app.

Your email address

Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number

You must be at least 18 years old to create an account

* Required fields

Already have an account? SIGN IN

By clicking Create Account you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use , Cookie policy and Privacy policy .

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged in

MORE ABOUT