Jihad and America

Enslaved: "Arabs languish under corrupt kleptocracies," says Bernard Lewis
The Weekender

Sign up to our free weekly newsletter for exclusive competitions, offers and theatre ticket deals

I would like to be emailed about offers, event and updates from Evening Standard. Read our privacy notice.

As war against a murderous Stalinist tyranny rages in Iraq, these two books address the big picture of the West's (meaning America's) relations with Islam, or rather with the Arab world, since neither author has much to say about Bosnia, India or South-East Asia, or indeed about Europe. Princeton's Bernard Lewis has the not inconsiderable advantage of knowing the languages and history of the Islamic world, whereas the LSE's John Gray expatiates on an enormous range of more-or-less related themes despite his competence in any single field (such as economics, history, the Middle East, religion, terrorism) being unclear.

Exasperated by tiers mondiste indulgence towards "the Other", Lewis tells it like it is in a book that is bleak and sobering. Of the 59 members of the Organisation of the Islamic Conference, one is (fitfully) considered to be a democracy, although there are hardly queues for visas to live in Istanbul. The oil-rich, good old days of yachts and Pakistani or Filipino helots are nearly over, leaving ever-larger numbers of young Arab men idle and resentful.

Whatever cultural credit the civilisation that built the Alhambra once possessed is long exhausted; the total of all books translated into Arabic since the ninth century equals the annual number of translations into Spanish.

Young Arabs who see the cultural, economic, political and technological achievements of the West on satellite television languish under corrupt kleptocracies, Stalinist single-party dictatorships or feudal monarchies that have discovered the trick of deflecting their people's energies (such as they are) into religious extremism.

Lewis invites us to consider the reality of Saudi Arabia, home of several of the 9/11 murderers, until their primary allegiances transferred to the virtual base of al Qaeda in protest against American forces come to protect them and liberate the Kuwaitis.

Imagine that Houston dynasts put the oil revenues of Texas at the disposal of the Ku Klux Klan. This enabled the KKK to proselytise their racist Christianity via religious seminaries. Maniacs believing in a Black-Catholic-Jewish-Masonic conspiracy proliferated.

Few western liberals would take a very indulgent view towards that scenario, yet even semi-respectable British intellectual publications (and there are few of those) chose to ignore this aspect of 9/11, preferring instead to suggest that the victim nation somehow "deserved it".

In fact, reluctant American involvement in the Middle East commenced when the Soviets sought to exploit regional resentments against the French and British. Arab anti-Americanism draws on Rightwing German critiques of western " decadence", Marxist anti-imperialist rhetoric, and the fear of seduction by the (great) Satan espoused by such Islamic militants as Sayyid Qutb or Khomeini. By some massive irony of history, the US armed and organised Islamic resistance to the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan, an invasion the PLO actually defended.

Having played what they regard as the leading role in destroying the Soviet empire, Bin Laden turned on the "paper tiger" of America, a misapprehension encouraged by what they had seen in Beirut or Mogadishu or while sneaking a drink in luxury hotels in Manhattan. Missiles plunging into SUVs (sports utility vehicles) in Afghanistan or Yemen at the behest of controllers in Florida or a CIA wake-up call in Karachi may have corrected that.

While Lewis concentrates on the failings of the Islamic world, Gray - ignoring such phenomena as the medieval Assassins or Mahdism - depicts al Qaeda as a quintessentially "modern" revenge response to the Western " political religion" of globalisation, whose "prophets" he sees as the lineal successors of such utopians as the French Positivists, the Bolsheviks and the Nazis. For the terrorists are not Gray's principal villains. In what often reads like a feud with the LSE's "positivist" economists, Gray sets up the fervour of free-market ideologues, seeking to make the world in their own image, only to admit that the Bush administration seems to be heading towards protectionism.

In a bizarre departure from the Leftist nostrum that the war in Iraq is about oil, Gray writes: "The Republican Party owes a great deal - not least in terms of funding - to fundamentalist Christian groups. Part of the drive to reshape the Middle East comes from the Christian fundamentalist belief that a major conflagration will fulfil biblical prophecies of a catastrophic conflict in the region. To the extent that it reflects this type of thinking, American foreign policy is itself fundamentalist."

Instead of counting the oil barrels to help them sleep, Dick Cheney and Colin Powell are tucked up in bed pondering the Book of Revelations. To quote one of Gray's own nostrums: "The advance of knowledge does not portend any age of reason. It merely adds another twist to human folly."

Create a FREE account to continue reading

eros

Registration is a free and easy way to support our journalism.

Join our community where you can: comment on stories; sign up to newsletters; enter competitions and access content on our app.

Your email address

Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number

You must be at least 18 years old to create an account

* Required fields

Already have an account? SIGN IN

By clicking Create Account you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use , Cookie policy and Privacy policy .

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged in