US weedkiller manufacturer Monsanto ordered to pay $289 million in damages to groundskeeper in Roundup cancer trial

Alexandra Richards12 August 2018

US weedkiller manufacturer Monsanto has been ordered to pay £226 million ($289 million) in damages to a man who claims the herbicide was a contributing factor to him developing terminal cancer.

Dewayne Johnson was awarded the huge sum by a state jury in the US, who found manufacturer Monsanto had failed to adequately warn of the risks of using Roundup, which contains the world's most widely-used herbicide glyphosate.

The groundsman's lawyers said he was diagnosed with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma in 2014, having used Roundup and a similar Monsanto product, Ranger Pro, in large quantities while working for a school authority.

The maker of Roundup weedkiller has insisted British consumers are safe to use the product.

Dewayne Johnson has said his excessive use of weedkiller Roundup was a factor in causing him to develop terminal cancer
REUTERS

The court heard Mr Johnson used the weedkiller in large amounts while working in the San Francisco Bay Area school district.

When using the product in windy conditions it would come into contact with his face, while on one occasion he was left soaked in the weedkiller when a hose broke.

On Friday, the jury in San Francisco found that Roundup was a "substantial factor" in Mr Johnson's illness and that the company should have provided a label warning of the potential health hazard.

Jurors also found that the potential risks of the product were known by the scientific community and Monsanto failed to "adequately warn" of the danger.

Furthermore, the jury found Monsanto officials acted with "malice and oppression" in their selling of the product despite its risks being known.

Monsanto vice president Scott Partridge said hundreds of studies showed the herbicide does not cause cancer and said the company would appeal the verdict to "vigorously defend this product".

Mr Partridge said that more than 800 scientific studies and reviews and conclusions by regulators in the US and around the world "support the fact that glyphosate does not cause cancer".

Mr Partridge said of the verdict: "The jury made a decision, but the decision that a jury or a judge makes has to be based on the weight of the evidence and the overwhelming weight of the evidence that went in the trial was that science demonstrates glyphosate is safe, there's no credible evidence to the contrary.

Monsanto Vice President Scott Partridge speaks during a press conference
AFP/Getty Images

"I understand that we all have sympathy for Mr Johnson, certainly the jury had sympathy for Mr Johnson, but that should not change the manner in which legal decisions are made. They should be made on the weight of the evidence."

Defending his product he said: "Roundup has been safe for four decades and will continue to be safe. There is no credible scientific evidence that demonstrates otherwise.

"It is completely and totally safe and the public should not be concerned about this verdict, it is one that we will work through the legal process to see if we can get the right result. The science is crystal clear."

Labour deputy leader Tom Watson said on Twitter that the verdict has "huge implications for the food chain".

Dewayne Johnson (L) hugs one of his attorneys after the verdict was read in the case against Monsanto at the Superior Court Of California in San Francisco, California
AFP/Getty Images

Roundup is one of the country's most popular weedkiller brands, while glyphosate herbicides are the most widely used herbicide in UK agriculture.

Environmentalists say the weedkiller is linked to cancer, although the claim is strongly denied by manufacturers and the EU has approved the chemical for use.

In 2016, a joint report by the World Health Organisation (WHO) and the UN said that, while there was "some evidence of a positive association between glyphosate exposure and risk of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma" in some studies, the only large study of high quality found "no evidence of an association at any exposure level".

It concluded that glyphosate "is unlikely to pose a carcinogenic risk to humans from exposure through the diet".

It came after the France-based International Agency for Research on Cancer, which is part of the WHO, said in 2015 that glyphosate was a "probable human carcinogen".

In 2017 the European Union extended the licence for use of glyphosate for five years.

The chemical is used to prepare fields for planting and to make harvesting easier.

Farmers warn that banning the chemical could cut crop yields by more than 10 per cent, costing the economy hundreds of millions of pounds.

Create a FREE account to continue reading

eros

Registration is a free and easy way to support our journalism.

Join our community where you can: comment on stories; sign up to newsletters; enter competitions and access content on our app.

Your email address

Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number

You must be at least 18 years old to create an account

* Required fields

Already have an account? SIGN IN

By clicking Create Account you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use , Cookie policy and Privacy policy .

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged in