Terminally ill Noel Conway loses High Court fight to end his own life

High Court: Noel Conway, 67, who has motor neurone disease, has lost his legal fight to be allowed to end his own life.
PA

A terminally ill man who says he feels “entombed” by motor neurone disease has lost his High Court fight to enable doctors to help him end his own life.

Noel Conway, a 67-year-old retired lecturer, asked for the law on assisting dying to be changed to allow him a “peaceful and dignified” death. But judges have rejected his case.

Mr Conway has vowed to appeal against the decision, made at the High Court by Lord Justice Sales, Mrs Justice Whipple and Mr Justice Garnham on Thursday.

They dismissed his application for a declaration that the Suicide Act 1961 is incompatible with Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights, which relates to respect for private and family life.

When Mr Conway has less than six months to live and retains the mental capacity to make the decision, he wishes to be able to enlist assistance from the medical profession to bring about a "peaceful and dignified" death.

The law as it stands means that anyone who helped him would be committing a criminal offence.

He said in a statement: "I am deeply disappointed by today's judgment and fully intend to appeal it. The experiences of those who are terminally ill need to be heard.

"This decision denies me a real say over how and when I will die. I am told the only option I currently have is to effectively suffocate to death by choosing to remove my ventilator, which I am now dependent on to breathe for up to 22 hours a day.

"There is no way of knowing how long it would take me to die if I did this, or whether my suffering could be fully relieved. To me, this is not choice - this is cruelty.”

Mr Conway said he faces “unbearable suffering”, and the possibility of a “traumatic, drawn-out death”.

"Travelling to Switzerland is no longer a viable option and I cannot put my family or doctors at risk of prosecution by asking for their help here at home,” he added.

"Knowing I had the option of a safe, peaceful, assisted death at a time of my choosing would allow me to face my final months without the fear and anxiety that currently plagues me and my loved ones.

"It would allow me to live the rest of my life on my own terms, knowing I was in control rather than at the mercy of a cruel illness.”

The former lecturer said he was “overwhelmed” by the support shown for him by the public throughout the case.

He added: “I know that this fight is important not just to me, but thousands of others.

"I am undeterred by today's decision and will appeal it with the support of my legal team and Dignity In Dying."

The case was opposed by the Secretary of State for Justice, with Humanists UK, Care Not Killing and Not Dead Yet UK also making submissions.

James Strachan QC said that while Mr Conway's "tragic and distressing" circumstances could only evoke the deepest sympathy, it was inappropriate for the courts to interfere with Parliament's legitimate decision on the "sensitive moral, social and ethical issue" raised.

It is the first challenge to the existing law since the case of Tony Nicklinson, who suffered from paralysis after a stroke.

That was ultimately dismissed in June 2014 by the Supreme Court, which said it was important that Parliament debated the issues before any decision was made by the courts.

After debates in the House of Commons and the House of Lords, Parliament decided, at least for the moment, not to provide for legislative exceptions to the 1961 Act.

In Thursday's ruling, Lord Justice Sales said that the prohibition against provision of assistance in the Act achieved a fair balance between the interests of the wider community and the interests of people in Mr Conway's position.

"It is legitimate in this area for the legislature to seek to lay down clear and defensible standards in order to provide guidance for society, to avoid distressing and difficult disputes at the end of life and to avoid creating a slippery slope leading to incremental expansion over time of the categories of people to whom similar assistance for suicide might have to be provided."

Sarah Wootton, chief executive of Dignity in Dying, said: "It is clear the current law does not work, when every eight days someone from this country travels to Dignitas; every year 300 dying people end their own lives at home in England and Wales; and thousands more experience unimaginable suffering right to the bitter end.”

Create a FREE account to continue reading

eros

Registration is a free and easy way to support our journalism.

Join our community where you can: comment on stories; sign up to newsletters; enter competitions and access content on our app.

Your email address

Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number

You must be at least 18 years old to create an account

* Required fields

Already have an account? SIGN IN

By clicking Create Account you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use , Cookie policy and Privacy policy .

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged in