Buncefield blast liability ruling

12 April 2012

The question of liability over the 2005 Buncefield oil depot blast is to be decided at the High Court.

Mr Justice David Steel's ruling will clarify who should pay the property damage bills of individual and business claimants outside the site's perimeter.

The explosion - widely thought to be the largest ever in peacetime Europe - was the result of an overspillage at the Hertfordshire depot.

It is believed 300 tonnes of petrol spilled over from the top of one of the storage tanks.

It formed a huge vapour cloud which ignited, causing widespread damage and injuring 43 people.

The site is operated by Hertfordshire Oil Storage Ltd (HOSL) - a joint venture between Total with 60% and Chevron with 40%.

Total has claimed that Chevron should share responsibility for the incident while Chevron, which denies liability, says Total was in day-to-day control at the site.

At the trial of the action, in the autumn, Jonathan Gaisman QC, representing the claimants outside the fence, said that his clients' unsatisfied insurance claims totalled £370 million.

Create a FREE account to continue reading

eros

Registration is a free and easy way to support our journalism.

Join our community where you can: comment on stories; sign up to newsletters; enter competitions and access content on our app.

Your email address

Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number

You must be at least 18 years old to create an account

* Required fields

Already have an account? SIGN IN

By clicking Create Account you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use , Cookie policy and Privacy policy .

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged in