Rail firms face £100m legal claim over 'making passengers pay double'

EXCLUSIVE: Rail companies that run the Southeastern and South Western networks are alleged to have overcharged millions of customers with 'boundary fares'
An analysis estimates that 168 million journeys have been affected by the “unfair” overcharging since October 2015
AFP/Getty Images

A massive legal claim for almost £100 million was launched today against three commuter train operators accused of forcing passengers to “pay double” for their journeys.

The rail companies that run the Southeastern and South Western networks are alleged to have overcharged millions of customers who bought tickets for travel beyond the zones covered by their Travelcards.

The claim, lodged with the Competition Appeal Tribunal this morning, argues that they should have been offered the chance to pay “boundary fares” for the “gap” between the outer limit of their Travelcard zone coverage and their final destination.

But in reality these fares were not promoted or made available for sale online, over the phone or at platform machines and were rarely offered at ticket counters. This left passengers with “little option” other than to pay twice, according to the claim.

It is being led by the former head of research at Citizens Advice, Justin Gutmann, who also spent eight years working for London Underground.

He has commissioned research from analysts Alix Partners estimating that 168 million journeys have been affected by the “unfair” overcharging since October 2015, with UK rail passengers owed £93 million and passengers from outside the UK a further £4.5 million.

For example, a passenger holding a zones one to six Travelcard who wanted to travel from Victoria to Rochester would be entitled to pay just £8.70 for a boundary fare from the outer limit of zone six to the end destination.

But in reality the vast majority of passengers buying the ticket on the day are charged the full fare of £18.70, an overpayment of £10.

Similarly a trip from Waterloo to Addlestone in Surrey should cost only a £5.10 boundary fare for the holder of a zones 1 to 6 Travelcard. However, the normally charged full fare is £10.40, an overpayment of £5.30.

Mr Gutmann said: “Passengers in London already pay a lot of money for trains that are often delayed or not even running. Now,following extensive research, we have found that some passengers are paying twice for parts of their rail journeys. We are launching this legal action to ensure that the money that South Western and Southeastern have made from this is returned to those train users.

“Millions of rail passengers could be eligible for compensation. Let’s put this right and stop train companies taking passengers for a ride.”

The tribunal will be asked to decide whether the claim can proceed as a “collective proceeding order” similar to a class action under Chapter II of the 1998 Competition Act and Article 102 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.

If it is allowed to go forward any passenger who had a Travelcard at any time from October 1, 2015 and also purchased a rail fare from a station within the zones of their Travelcard to a destination outside the zones may be eligible for compensation. Affected passengers who do not live in the UK will also be eligible to join the claim but must opt in.

The companies involved are Stagecoach South Western Trains, which ran the South Western franchise up to August 2017, and the current operator First MTR South Western Trains, as well as London and South Eastern Railway, which holds the Southeastern train franchise.

A spokesman for First MTR South Western Trains said: “We are committed to providing customers with the best range of fares and ticketing options – including online, via mobile phones, in person and over the phone – so we believe this unfounded claim fundamentally misrepresents how rail fares are set and how tickets are sold; we will robustly defend ourselves against it.”

A spokesman for Southeastern said: “We’ve just received a claim today in respect of this matter and we’re reviewing it. Unfortunately we’re unable to provide any further comment at this stage because the matter is the subject of ongoing legal proceedings.”

A spokesman for Stagecoach South Western Trains said: “These allegations are without foundation and we do not believe this claim has any legal merit.”

Create a FREE account to continue reading

eros

Registration is a free and easy way to support our journalism.

Join our community where you can: comment on stories; sign up to newsletters; enter competitions and access content on our app.

Your email address

Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number

You must be at least 18 years old to create an account

* Required fields

Already have an account? SIGN IN

By clicking Create Account you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use , Cookie policy and Privacy policy .

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged in