MPs demand overhaul of Government contracts after PPE ‘fast track’

The weekly question-time debate at the House of Commons in London
Boris Johnson was forced to defend the Government’s handling of contracts
via REUTERS
WEST END FINAL

Get our award-winning daily news email featuring exclusive stories, opinion and expert analysis

I would like to be emailed about offers, event and updates from Evening Standard. Read our privacy notice.

MPs today demanded an overhaul of the way government contracts are being handled after ministers were accused of cronyism over a “fast-track VIP lane” for PPE deals.

Boris Johnson was forced to defend the Government’s handling of contracts after a watchdog revealed that companies recommended by MPs, peers and ministers’ offices were given priority during the race to obtain PPE.

It emerged that a number of multi-million pound contracts were awarded to companies and businessmen with little or no experience of supplying PPE. The chairwoman of the Public Accounts Committee Meg Hillier has called for all contracts to be published.

She told the Standard: “[Contracts] go up on the website... but they’ve been sloppy on this. They should put them up within 90 days of them being let and they are missing that by miles.

“We need more transparency not less. There’s lots of taxpayers’ money being spent without competition.

“They keep letting these new contracts with our money and we can’t see who is getting it and what they are supposed to be delivering.

“We need it sooner rather than later because they are not going through the normal process.”

The Government was under huge pressure to get more PPE at the start of the pandemic so many contracts had to be awarded without the usual competitive tendering process.

However, the National Audit Office report raised concerns about the so-called “VIP lane” of contracts.

It said that more than £10 billion in contracts were awarded without competition and not enough was done to address potential conflicts of interest.

MPs were said in the report to have paid £21 million to a middleman who acted as a go-between to provide PPE.

Create a FREE account to continue reading

eros

Registration is a free and easy way to support our journalism.

Join our community where you can: comment on stories; sign up to newsletters; enter competitions and access content on our app.

Your email address

Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number

You must be at least 18 years old to create an account

* Required fields

Already have an account? SIGN IN

By clicking Create Account you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use , Cookie policy and Privacy policy .

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged in