Commons Speaker Hoyle warns of prejudice risk if China spy suspect named

The 28-year-old researcher has insisted he is completely innocent and he has not been named by police.
Speaker Sir Lindsay Hoyle warned that discussing the identities of those involved could hamper any future prosecution (House of Commons/PA)
PA Wire
David Hughes11 September 2023
WEST END FINAL

Get our award-winning daily news email featuring exclusive stories, opinion and expert analysis

I would like to be emailed about offers, event and updates from Evening Standard. Read our privacy notice.

MPs have been urged not to name the parliamentary researcher arrested on suspicion of spying for China to avoid the risk of prejudice.

Commons Speaker Sir Lindsay Hoyle warned that discussing the identities of those involved could hamper any future prosecution.

The 28-year-old researcher has insisted he is completely innocent and he has not been named by police.

However, The Times newspaper has published the name of the researcher, with former Tory leader Sir Iain Duncan Smith saying there was a “clear public interest” in identifying him.

There had been speculation a MP would use the protection of parliamentary privilege to publicly name the suspect.

But Sir Lindsay told MPs: “I would remind all members of the importance of not discussing security issues on the floor of the House.

“That is particularly important in this case, where commenting on the identities of those alleged to be involved, engaging in speculation about the case or discussing other details runs a serious risk of prejudicing any future prosecutions – which the comments made in the media were unhelpful – something for which I’m sure no member will want to be responsible.”

Recent court rulings have made news organisations wary about naming suspects before they are charged.

The Supreme Court ruled last year in the case of a US citizen known only as ZXC that a person being investigated for a crime generally has “a reasonable expectation of privacy”.

The ruling confirmed the decision of the High Court in pop veteran Sir Cliff Richard’s privacy case against the BBC over its coverage of a South Yorkshire Police raid on his home in Sunningdale, Berkshire, in August 2014.

Create a FREE account to continue reading

eros

Registration is a free and easy way to support our journalism.

Join our community where you can: comment on stories; sign up to newsletters; enter competitions and access content on our app.

Your email address

Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number

You must be at least 18 years old to create an account

* Required fields

Already have an account? SIGN IN

By clicking Create Account you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use , Cookie policy and Privacy policy .

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged in