Hypocrisy row over plot to keep MPs' names secret when they get arrested

MPs debate change saying revealing their identities breaches their human right to privacy
Debate: MPs want to block their names being revealed if they are arrested
Dan Kitwood/Getty Images
Joseph Watts10 February 2016
WEST END FINAL

Get our award-winning daily news email featuring exclusive stories, opinion and expert analysis

I would like to be emailed about offers, event and updates from Evening Standard. Read our privacy notice.

Top eurosceptic minister Chris Grayling was today branded a “hypocrite” for backing new rules that block arrested MPs’ names being published.

MPs say the change is needed because revealing their identities breaches their “right to privacy” under the European Convention of Human Rights.

Yet Mr Grayling, an outspoken critic of the Human Rights Act who has said it should be scrapped, will be the cabinet minister to propose the change to the Commons today.

Labour MP John Mann said: “What a hypocrite. He only wants the Human Rights Act to apply to himself, not to the rest of the country.”

Labour’s Mr Mann also warned it could mean MPs fighting an election while voters are unaware they have been arrested.

It is an age old convention that when an MP is arrested the police inform the Commons and the authorities publish their name.

But a committee of MPs recently recommended changing the rules because of the potential damage to the reputation of an MP who is later not charged.

The report also specifically cites the ECHR and says rules should be changed because the naming of MPs is “incompatible” with their right to privacy.

Mr Mann said: “It’s a total nonsense.

“Parliament has right to know if somebody has been arrested because that could affect decisions in Parliament and their electorate has a right to know.

“It is a part of democracy and it protects democracy.”

Mr Grayling made no comment today, but a Tory source said: “Labour MPs are being hypocritical given their members of the Procedure Committee recommended this change to bring the treatment of MPs into line with that of members of the public.”

Meanwhile a Number 10 official said it was a matter for Parliament, but pointed out that the changes allowed for some “flexibility” on whether to name an MP or not.

Create a FREE account to continue reading

eros

Registration is a free and easy way to support our journalism.

Join our community where you can: comment on stories; sign up to newsletters; enter competitions and access content on our app.

Your email address

Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number

You must be at least 18 years old to create an account

* Required fields

Already have an account? SIGN IN

By clicking Create Account you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use , Cookie policy and Privacy policy .

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged in