Councils slam Northern MP Mark Menzies for backing Heathrow expansion but opposing fracking in his backyard

Criticised: Lancashire MP Mark Menzies supported a local campaign to stop fracking
Dave Benett
WEST END FINAL

Get our award-winning daily news email featuring exclusive stories, opinion and expert analysis

I would like to be emailed about offers, event and updates from Evening Standard. Read our privacy notice.

London town hall chiefs criticised a Lancashire MP today for backing a third runway at Heathrow while opposing the go-ahead for fracking in his area.

Lord True, leader of Richmond council, Wandsworth’s leader Ravi Govindia and Hillingdon’s leader Ray Puddifoot criticised Fylde MP Mark Menzies.

The three Tory council leaders highlighted that last year he backed campaigners seeking to stop fracking in the village of Little Plumpton in his constituency. They also said he was well-known for promoting localism.

“For our part, we will not mount a campaign to advance the interests of fracking in Little Plumpton,” they said on the ConservativeHome website.

But they also added: “If anyone thinks Conservatives in west London are prepared to accept Heathrow as the best answer to providing much-needed expansion in the South-East, then we have a message for them on behalf of our constituents.

“You’re fracking joking.”

Mr Menzies brushed off their criticism and repeated his support for another runway at Heathrow, saying: “Let’s get on and build it.” 

The Conservative MP dismissed as “ludicrous” the comparison between his stance on shale gas and expansion of the west London airport.

“The vast majority of people who live near Heathrow have actively decided to live under the airspace of one of the world’s busiest international airports,” he argued. “In stark contrast, the prospect of hydraulic fracturing for shale gas in rural parts of Fylde is not only new to local residents but entirely new to the whole of the UK.”

The three council chiefs said the MP’s comments backing a bigger Heathrow were not likely to be “exceptional views 250 miles north of west London”.

They added: “It’s easy to see a consensus if your electors are not amongst the hundreds of thousands of people whose lives are already blighted by the noise, air pollution, traffic and environmental degradation that is Heathrow. And that’s before expansion.”

Create a FREE account to continue reading

eros

Registration is a free and easy way to support our journalism.

Join our community where you can: comment on stories; sign up to newsletters; enter competitions and access content on our app.

Your email address

Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number

You must be at least 18 years old to create an account

* Required fields

Already have an account? SIGN IN

By clicking Create Account you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use , Cookie policy and Privacy policy .

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged in

MORE ABOUT