Met chief Sir Mark Rowley again refuses to use ‘institutional’ to describe police’s problems

Sir Mark Rowley said the word had an “ambiguous” set of meetings, as well as being politically contentious
Metropolitan Police Commissioner Sir Mark Rowley before answering questions from the London Assembly police and crime committee at City Hall
Metropolitan Police Commissioner Sir Mark Rowley before answering questions from the London Assembly police and crime committee at City Hall
PA
Noah Vickers22 March 2023

Met Police Commissioner Sir Mark Rowley has repeated his refusal to use the word “institutional” when describing the issues of racism, sexism and homophobia in his force.

The police chief insisted that he nonetheless “completely accepts the diagnosis” of Baroness Casey’s damning report into the Met and “there is zero defensiveness here”.

Sir Mark said he was content to use the word “systemic” to describe the Met’s problems, but that “institutional” was a politicised word with an “ambiguous” range of meanings.

He was challenged on the point by Caroline Russell, a Green member of the London Assembly, at a Wednesday meeting of the Assembly’s police and crime committee.

Earlier in the meeting, Baroness Casey had said Sir Mark’s refusal to use the word “rings hollow”, despite the high level respect she has for him and his leadership of the Met.

Metropolitan Police Commissioner Sir Mark Rowley with Baroness Louise Casey before answering question from the London Assembly police and crime committee at City Hall
Metropolitan Police Commissioner Sir Mark Rowley with Baroness Louise Casey before answering question from the London Assembly police and crime committee at City Hall
PA

Ms Russell said: “How can Londoners have confidence that things will change. They want to see that defensiveness, denial being addressed.

“Now I absolutely accept that you accept all the findings in the report, but I’m just saying that Londoners - they want to hear that.

Caroline Russell, a Green member of the London Assembly
Caroline Russell, a Green member of the London Assembly
London Assembly

“They’ve been waiting decades for that institutional, systemic racism in the Met to be seen and to be addressed and I just wonder if you’ve reflected on whether you could use the word ‘institutional’, systemic racism, since all the comment and conversation on this?”

Sir Mark responded: “I have used the word systemic. So just to be very clear on this, there is zero defensiveness here. I completely accept the diagnosis that [Dame] Louise [Casey] and her team have put on the table…

“I have, from last September, talked about systemic failings. So I’ve been really clear that while we have racists, misogynists and homophobes, this is not just about individuals, this about systemic failings that create bias. It’s about management failings, it's about cultural failings…

“As a police officer I’m most focused on the practicalities of action and the things we’re doing. I do recognise though that words are important. The reason I’ve chosen not to use that word myself - I’m not disputing other people’s right to use it, I’m not trying to undermine that in any way.

Casey review publication
Sir Mark Rowley addressed the London Assembly’s police and crime committee on Wednesday
PA

“It’s simply two things though. One - it is an ambiguous term. In wider debate, it gets used very differently. A journalist yesterday picked a random definition out of the dictionary about institutional which has nothing to do with the Casey definition or the Macpherson [report into Stephen Lawrence’s murder] definition.

“The Macpherson definition has one definition - [Dame] Louise [Casey] sort of rephrases it with four bullet points.

“I just need to be practical, and I think, for me, talking credibly as a leader, I get it’s systemic, I get it’s management, I get it’s cultural and we’re going after it - that’s why I’ve come to that.

“And also, besides being ambiguous, it has been a concept which [politicians of the] left and right have kicked around, about its validity or not - and that doesn’t make it any easier either.

Metropolitan Police Commissioner Sir Mark Rowley answering questions from the London Assembly police and crime committee
Metropolitan Police Commissioner Sir Mark Rowley answering questions from the London Assembly police and crime committee
PA

“If I think something is the right thing to say, I couldn't care less whether Labour like it, or Lib Dems, or the Tories like it, I’ll say it if it's the right thing to say. But if it's also confusing, I can’t go there.”

He added: “I know a lot of people who don’t take part in these sort of ethereal discussions that we have - a lot of people instinctively think ‘well, that [the word ‘institutional’] probably means most people are racist’. Now I know that’s not what it means, but I think that’s the danger of it.”

Create a FREE account to continue reading

eros

Registration is a free and easy way to support our journalism.

Join our community where you can: comment on stories; sign up to newsletters; enter competitions and access content on our app.

Your email address

Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number

You must be at least 18 years old to create an account

* Required fields

Already have an account? SIGN IN

By clicking Create Account you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use , Cookie policy and Privacy policy .

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged in