Woolwich murder trial: Adebolajo evidence is no defence in law, says judge

 
Accused: Michael Adebowale (right) and Michael Adebolajo (left) during their trial at the Old Bailey
17 December 2013
WEST END FINAL

Get our award-winning daily news email featuring exclusive stories, opinion and expert analysis

I would like to be emailed about offers, event and updates from Evening Standard. Read our privacy notice.

One of the men accused of murdering soldier Lee Rigby has said nothing in evidence which is a defence in law, the Old Bailey heard today.

Mr Justice Sweeney told the jury that nothing had said by Michael Adebolajo in his evidence amounted in law to a defence to the charge of murder.

But defence counsel for both Adebolajo and Michael Adebowale can argue that the prosecution have failed to prove any of the elements of murder, he added.

Adebolajo and Michael Adebowale are said to have mown down the fusilier and then hacked his body to death in the street in Woolwich in May last year.

Said the judge: “I have ruled that nothing said by the first defendant and... his evidence - in short that he was a soldier of Allah and was justified in doing what he did - amounts in law to a defence to this count.

“So nothing that he has said amounts in law to a defence to count one.”

He added: “Both defence counsel must and will respect that ruling in their speeches.”

However Adebolajo, 29, and Adebowale, 22, no longer face a charge of conspiracy to murder a police officer.

They still face the murder charge and a count of attempting to murder a police officer. They both deny both charges.

In his closing speech, prosecutor Richard Whittam QC said “Islam, one of the world’s great religions, is not on trial.”

Recounting the events of May 22 and the prosecution’s case, Mr Whittam showed the jury once again images of bloodied knives, and also replayed the video clip in which Fusilier Rigby is seen being hit by a Vauxhall Tigra.

“What was the consequence of driving into Lee Rigby?” asked Mr Whittam. “The consequence was it broke his back.”

Replaying a video clip showing Fusilier Rigby being dragged into the road, Mr Whittam said: “Is this a humane killing?

“Is this a killing with an attempt to decapitate and then deposit the body in the middle of the road causing traffic to stop and turn around?”

Mr Whittam recalled witness accounts previously read to the jury as well as extracts from a note handed to Amanda Donnelly-Martin at the scene.

“You will have to consider if that’s a suicide note,” he said. “Note that it contains the phrase ‘If I live beyond this day’.

“What was the purpose of what they have done, killing Lee Rigby in the way the had done, in putting the body there and staying at the scene?

“To borrow a phrase from the first defendant - carnage.”

The case continues.

Create a FREE account to continue reading

eros

Registration is a free and easy way to support our journalism.

Join our community where you can: comment on stories; sign up to newsletters; enter competitions and access content on our app.

Your email address

Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number

You must be at least 18 years old to create an account

* Required fields

Already have an account? SIGN IN

By clicking Create Account you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use , Cookie policy and Privacy policy .

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged in