Met chief 'had a case to answer' over Stephen Lawrence family snooping

'Case to answer': Commander Richard Walton
Alex Lentati
Justin Davenport2 March 2016
WEST END FINAL

Get our award-winning daily news email featuring exclusive stories, opinion and expert analysis

I would like to be emailed about offers, event and updates from Evening Standard. Read our privacy notice.

A former Scotland Yard anti-terrorism chief had a case to answer for misconduct after meeting an undercover officer accused of snooping on the Stephen Lawrence family, the police watchdog said today.

Commander Richard Walton, who retired before misconduct proceedings could take place, met the undercover officer known as N81 while the Macpherson inquiry into the teenager’s murder was taking place in 1998.

The 18-year-old student was stabbed to death by racist white youths in Eltham in 1993 and the inquiry was launched into failures in the police investigation.

Today the Independent Police Complaints Commission said the Met’s reputation could have suffered “immense damage” had the meeting become public knowledge.

Stabbed to death: Stephen Lawrence
Metropolitan Police/Getty

It said Mr Walton had a case to answer for discreditable conduct for actions that could have brought the force into disrepute.

However, the IPCC also concluded there was no evidence that N81 passed information about the Lawrence family or their campaign to Mr Walton at the meeting, nor that Met submissions to the inquiry were altered as a result of the meeting.

The Met said in a statement it rejected the IPCC findings saying there was no evidence that Mr Walton’s intentions in arranging the meeting were improper.

The force added : “The IPCC findings acknowledge the meeting may have been legitimate and that the evidence suggests Mr. Walton had been asked to attend by a senior officer.

“They give these as reasons why Mr. Walton does not have a case to answer for gross misconduct. We believe that if the evidence points towards the meeting being legitimate or there is insufficient evidence that it was not legitimate then there could be no finding of misconduct, gross or otherwise.”

Create a FREE account to continue reading

eros

Registration is a free and easy way to support our journalism.

Join our community where you can: comment on stories; sign up to newsletters; enter competitions and access content on our app.

Your email address

Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number

You must be at least 18 years old to create an account

* Required fields

Already have an account? SIGN IN

By clicking Create Account you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use , Cookie policy and Privacy policy .

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged in