Lord Brittan: Met's sex abuse inquiry 'fully justified', second police force finds

Cleared: Lord Brittan died a year ago
PA
Sebastian Mann7 February 2016
WEST END FINAL

Get our award-winning daily news email featuring exclusive stories, opinion and expert analysis

I would like to be emailed about offers, event and updates from Evening Standard. Read our privacy notice.

A review has found the Metropolitan Police investigation into allegations of sex abuse against former Home Secretary Lord Brittan was “fully justified” – even though it was unlikely to result in a criminal conviction.

Lord Brittan died a year ago still under suspicion of being part of a VIP paedophile gang.

A lack of primary evidence in the case meant he was cleared by the Met of rape, though he died from cancer aged 75 without being notified of the decision.

And the way the Metropolitan Police handled the investigation has resulted in criticism for its commissioner Sir Bernard Hogan-Howe.

A review by Dorset Police has since vindicated the decision to investigate a rape claim by a student against Lord Brittan, dating back to 1967, but said any court case would likely result in an acquittal rather than a conviction.

The review said: "An investigation into allegations made by the complainant was necessary, proportionate and fully justified despite the significant passage of time."

It said the police log "was not a comprehensive document and omitted key elements of decision making" and lacked essential detail.

It also found a "poor standard" of obtaining evidence to be used in the case, and said the senior investigating officer made errors and was "inexperienced in rape investigation".

But the review also broadly supported the inquiry.

It said: "Skilful investigators pursued appropriate lines of inquiry from the complainant's account and obtained credible evidence.

"At the conclusion of these lines of inquiry, any reasonable investigator could properly conclude that the allegations made by the complainant were far from fanciful and continued to be proportionate and justified."

It described the complainant, a 19-year-old woman, as a "competent witness" who displayed "no malice" in her motivation. She had "little to gain from making a false allegation", the review added.

Additional reporting by PA

Create a FREE account to continue reading

eros

Registration is a free and easy way to support our journalism.

Join our community where you can: comment on stories; sign up to newsletters; enter competitions and access content on our app.

Your email address

Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number

You must be at least 18 years old to create an account

* Required fields

Already have an account? SIGN IN

By clicking Create Account you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use , Cookie policy and Privacy policy .

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged in