Jury goes out in trial of gunman accused of murdering police custody sergeant

Louis De Zoysa is claiming diminished responsibility over the shooting of Sgt Matt Ratana in Croydon, south London, in 2020.
Court artist sketch of Louis De Zoysa at Northampton Crown Court (Elizabeth Cook/PA)
PA Wire
Matthew Cooper22 June 2023
WEST END FINAL

Get our award-winning daily news email featuring exclusive stories, opinion and expert analysis

I would like to be emailed about offers, event and updates from Evening Standard. Read our privacy notice.

A jury has retired to consider its verdict on a gunman accused of murdering a Metropolitan Police sergeant using an antique revolver smuggled into a south London custody centre.

Lawyers acting for Louis De Zoysa, who claims he did not mean to shoot Sgt Matt Ratana, have argued the 25-year-old has a partial defence of diminished responsibility due to an “autistic meltdown”.

Jurors at Northampton Crown Court have been told Sgt Ratana, 54, died of a chest wound after being hit by two bullets at Croydon’s Windmill Road custody block in the early hours of September 25 2020.

De Zoysa, from Banstead, Surrey, denies committing murder while he was handcuffed in a holding room, after being found with bullets by members of a street patrol.

Addressing the jury before it retired on Thursday, Imran Khan KC, defending, asked its members to consider the evidence by stepping into De Zoysa’s shoes.

“Look at it not from your point of view as neurotypical individuals… but from his,” Mr Khan said.

The defence lawyer said of CCTV footage of the fatal shooting: “All this beggars belief, you may think.

“Out of the blue, without a hint of provocation, the gun was fired.

“The thought might be going through your head: ‘what the hell just happened and why did it happen?’

What it (CCTV) shows is a young man completely out of control, out of his mind. Anything else simply doesn't make sense. Louis was someone experiencing a meltdown

Defence barrister Imran Khan KC

“The events cry out for an explanation because when you look at it, there appears to be no logical, rational, sane explanation for what you are seeing. The prosecution has not provided an explanation.

“What it shows is a young man completely out of control, out of his mind.

“Anything else simply doesn’t make sense. Louis was someone experiencing a meltdown.”

The alternative to the defence’s suggested scenario, Mr Khan said, was the proposition that an autistic young man, surrounded by three police officers in a cell, was intent on murder in the middle of the night.

“If he was intent on murder how was he going to escape? It simply doesn’t make any sense,” Mr Khan said.

Before the jury retired at 2.02pm, Mr Justice Johnson urged the panel of seven men and five women not to feel under any time pressure to reach a verdict.

The jury was later sent home until Friday, when it will resume its deliberations.

Create a FREE account to continue reading

eros

Registration is a free and easy way to support our journalism.

Join our community where you can: comment on stories; sign up to newsletters; enter competitions and access content on our app.

Your email address

Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number

You must be at least 18 years old to create an account

* Required fields

Already have an account? SIGN IN

By clicking Create Account you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use , Cookie policy and Privacy policy .

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged in