Jailed: Two men who hammered nail into dog’s head in ‘barbaric’ act

Jailed: Two men have been jailed for hammering a nail into a dog's head
PA
Saphora Smith2 March 2017
WEST END FINAL

Get our award-winning daily news email featuring exclusive stories, opinion and expert analysis

I would like to be emailed about offers, event and updates from Evening Standard. Read our privacy notice.

Two men have been jailed after they hammered a nail into a dog's head and buried it alive in an attempt to save on vet bills.

The terrier, called Scamp, was discovered under a mound of earth by a couple walking in a wood but had to be put down due to its severe injuries.

Michael Heathcock, 59, and Richard Finch, 60, both from Redcar, had pleaded guilty to offences under the Animal Welfare Act.

Dozens of protesters gathered outside the court with their dogs and packed the public gallery to see the pair sentenced, shouting "Justice" after they were jailed.

John Ellwood, prosecuting for the RSPCA, told Teesside Magistrates' Court the facts of the case were "extremely distressing".

"Michael Heathcock and his friend Richard Finch together attempted to kill Mr Heathcock's terrier type dog Scamp by hitting it on the head with a hammer and driving a nail into its skull and then bury it alive," he said.

They decided to carry Scamp, who was deaf, blind and incontinent, to Kirkleatham Wood along with a claw hammer and a nail before digging a hole to bury the dog.

Mr Ellwood said the married couple who discovered Scamp had heard grunting noises coming from a pile of earth and went over to investigate.

After discovering the stricken animal they rang the police and took the dog to a vet.

Mr Ellwood said the vet concluded there would have been a minimum of six blows to the head and in 30 years it was the worst case of animal cruelty he had ever seen.

The court was told Heathcock thought he could not afford to have the 16-year-old animal put down, believing it would cost £300, so they decided to do it themselves.

Jailing them for four months each, chairman of the bench Frances Linsley said: "This was a barbaric act which was premeditated and caused untold suffering to the dog Scamp."

Dominic Tate, defending, claimed Heathcock loved the dog and "after 16 years of having Scamp and caring for the dog this was not his intention".

He said: "He did not set out to cause unnecessary suffering."

Additional reporting by Press Association

Create a FREE account to continue reading

eros

Registration is a free and easy way to support our journalism.

Join our community where you can: comment on stories; sign up to newsletters; enter competitions and access content on our app.

Your email address

Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number

You must be at least 18 years old to create an account

* Required fields

Already have an account? SIGN IN

By clicking Create Account you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use , Cookie policy and Privacy policy .

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged in