Hillsborough Disaster: Police commander David Duckenfield to face retrial

David Duckenfield arrives at Preston Crown Court at the end of his trial in April 2019.
Owen Humphreys/PA
WEST END FINAL

Get our award-winning daily news email featuring exclusive stories, opinion and expert analysis

I would like to be emailed about offers, event and updates from Evening Standard. Read our privacy notice.

Hillsborough match commander David Duckenfield will a face retrial over the deaths of 95 Liverpool fans, a court hearing has ruled.

Former Ch Supt Duckenfield, 74, was charged with gross negligence manslaughter of the supporters who died in the disaster at the FA Cup semi-final on April 15, 1989.

But after a ten-week trial and eight days of deliberations ending in April this year, a jury at Preston Crown Court failed to reach a verdict.

At the same court on Tuesday morning, judge Sir Peter Openshaw​ ruled that the ex-South Yorkshire Police officer should face another trial over the charges.

The retrial is expected to take place on October 7.

Around ten family members were in court as the judge made his ruling, which followed a hearing on Monday.

Court was adjourned until later on Tuesday for legal discussions.

The Hillsborough disaster took place as the ground in Sheffield hosted an FA Cup semi-final between Liverpool and Nottingham Forest.

A court previously heard that Duckenfield, who was promoted to the match commander role less than three weeks earlier, ordered the opening of a stadium exit gate to relieve congestion outside the turnstiles allocated to Liverpool supporters.

Around 2,000 men, women and children then entered, many heading down a tunnel and into the Leppings Lane terrace where the crush took place.

The decision to prosecute came after a lengthy campaign by the victims’ families for the circumstances to be reinvestigated.

Under the law at the time, there can be no prosecution for the 96th victim, Tony Bland, as he died more than a year and a day after the disaster.

The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) sought a retrial after the jury was discharged in April, despite opposition Duckenfield's lawyers, who resisted the application.

Create a FREE account to continue reading

eros

Registration is a free and easy way to support our journalism.

Join our community where you can: comment on stories; sign up to newsletters; enter competitions and access content on our app.

Your email address

Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number

You must be at least 18 years old to create an account

* Required fields

Already have an account? SIGN IN

By clicking Create Account you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use , Cookie policy and Privacy policy .

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged in