Chris Moyles defends himself after tribunal finds he claimed to be a second-hand car dealer to save up to £1million in tax

 
Tribunal: Chris Moyles
Staff|Agency21 February 2014

Former Radio 1 DJ Chris Moyles has said he "accepts" the findings of a tribunal which revealed he pretended to be a second-hand car dealer in a bid to save up to £1million in tax.

A tax court named Moyles and two other men as having taking part in a scheme called "Working Wheels" which counted "450 fund managers, celebrities and other high earners between 2006 and 2008" as members.

The scheme worked by allowing its members to say they had incurred large fees while working in the second-hand car trade which they could claim back against their tax bill.

A published judgement from the Tax Chamber of the First-tier Tribunal said Moyles's self-assessment tax return for the financial year ending on April 5, 2008, when he was presenting Radio 1's Breakfast Show, said he "had engaged in self-employment as a used car trader".

Moyles, who celebrates his 40th birthday tomorrow, did not give evidence directly to the tribunal but did submit "a brief witness statement".

The tribunal, under Judge Colin Bishopp, described that evidence as "very brief and rather uninformative".

The judgement said: "It is however quite clear from the statement that he too entered the scheme for no purpose other than to achieve a tax saving, and that he took no interest in the trade."

It went on to say that Moyles was "anxious to be reassured that the scheme was lawful, and that he would not have to undertake any trading himself".

But Moyles took to Twitter this evening to defend his actions.

In a series of tweets to his three million followers, he said he had been "naive" to sign up to the scheme and had "learnt a valuable lesson".

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">I want to comment about a recent tribunal tax ruling.— Chris Moyles (@CHRISDJMOYLES) <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="https://twitter.com/CHRISDJMOYLES/statuses/436924388337004544" class="body-link" data-vars-item-name="BL-308206-https://twitter.com/CHRISDJMOYLES/statuses/436924388337004544" data-vars-event-id="c23">February 21, 2014</a>

He said: "I want to comment about a recent tribunal tax ruling.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">Upon advice, I signed up to a scheme which I was assured was legal. Despite this, my knowledge of the dealings of the scheme were naive.— Chris Moyles (@CHRISDJMOYLES) <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="https://twitter.com/CHRISDJMOYLES/statuses/436924480041275392" class="body-link" data-vars-item-name="BL-308206-https://twitter.com/CHRISDJMOYLES/statuses/436924480041275392" data-vars-event-id="c23">February 21, 2014</a>


"Upon advice, I signed up to a scheme which I was assured was legal. Despite this, my knowledge of the dealings of the scheme were naive.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">I'm not a tax expert and acted on advice I was given. This was a mistake and I accept the ruling without reservation.— Chris Moyles (@CHRISDJMOYLES) <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="https://twitter.com/CHRISDJMOYLES/statuses/436924532348436480" class="body-link" data-vars-item-name="BL-308206-https://twitter.com/CHRISDJMOYLES/statuses/436924532348436480" data-vars-event-id="c23">February 21, 2014</a>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">I take full responsibility and have learnt a valuable lesson.— Chris Moyles (@CHRISDJMOYLES) <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="https://twitter.com/CHRISDJMOYLES/statuses/436924577437188096" class="body-link" data-vars-item-name="BL-308206-https://twitter.com/CHRISDJMOYLES/statuses/436924577437188096" data-vars-event-id="c23">February 21, 2014</a>

"I take full responsibility and have learnt a valuable lesson."

The tribunal judgement said his accountant, a Mr Smith, had "agreed that the scale of Moyles's borrowing was driven solely by the amount of the tax loss he wanted to achieve, in his case £1 million, and that the trading was not carried on for its own sake but was merely a means to an end".

Exchequer Secretary David Gauke said: "This case is another example of why taxpayers should not fall for the promises of promoters selling schemes that are all too often too good to be true. Not only will the taxpayer waste money on the fees for these failed schemes, they will still have to pay all the tax, interest and penalties that are due.

"This Government has provided HMRC with the resources to tackle these avoidance schemes and HMRC will now pursue the other users of the scheme to make sure all the taxes that are due are paid."

Create a FREE account to continue reading

eros

Registration is a free and easy way to support our journalism.

Join our community where you can: comment on stories; sign up to newsletters; enter competitions and access content on our app.

Your email address

Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number

You must be at least 18 years old to create an account

* Required fields

Already have an account? SIGN IN

By clicking Create Account you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use , Cookie policy and Privacy policy .

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged in