Scientist warns biofuels could cause more harm than good

12 April 2012

A leading scientist has warned that the push for "green" biofuels may be doing more harm to the environment than good.

Professor Robert Watson, the chief environmental advisor, said laws to boost use of biofuels by cars should be postponed until a review of their impact is carried out.

From 1 April, petrol stations must ensure that at least 2.5 per cent of fuel at their pumps is from biofuels - made from crops rather than oil - to bring them into line with an EU directive.

Scroll down for more...

Biofuels, mainly ethanol and diesel made from plants, have been promoted as an alternative to the use of liquid fuels in transport

He said it would be "totally insane" if it turned out that biofuels, which are designed to cut harmful carbon emissions, actually led to an increase in carbon production.

Biofuels, mainly ethanol and diesel made from plants, have been promoted as an alternative to the use of fuels made from oil in transport, which account for about a quarter of all global greenhouse emissions.

But some scientists think their benefits could be outweighed by negative effects from their production.

Speaking on the BBC Today programme yesterday, Professor Watson said biofuels policy in the UK and the rest of the European Union may have run ahead of the science.

"Many people still believe that some biofuels are indeed still sustainable from an environmental standpoint,' he said.

"I think we need to check that. It would obviously be totally insane if we had a policy to try and reduce greenhouse gas emissions through the use of biofuels that's actually leading to an increase in the greenhouse gases from biofuels."

He said the Renewable Transport Fuel Obligation, which places fines on petrol suppliers who do not provide biofuels on pain of hefty fines, should be delayed. From April all stations will have to provide 2.5 per cent of petrol from renewable sources - rising to 5 per cent by 2010.

"I would suggest that we would indeed wait until the review is completed," he said.

Yesterday a coalition of pressure groups from Oxfam to Greenpeace wrote to the Department of Transport, demanding that the obligation be delayed until after a review.

And the EU's environment commissioner Stavros Dimas admitted yesterday that there were question marks over the 2010 target. He said it should only be met if the biofuels have been sustainably produced.

It is often not possible to say whether biofuels are truly sustainable because their origins are impossible to trace.

However, many scientists say some fuels, such as ethanol from sugar cane, are sustainable.

Others say biofuels may in fact increase the carbon debt caused by ploughing virgin soil, which releases carbon dioxide. This could outweigh the potential carbon saving from biofuels.

Researchers writing recently in the journal Science said the renewable fuel obligation was less effective in cutting carbon emissions than a programme of restoring forests and protecting plant habitats.

They compared the environmental benefits of growing crops on arable land to produce biofuels, or replanting the same land with trees.

Their conclusion was that the quantity of carbon dioxide absorbed by forests over 30 years would be "considerably greater" than the emissions avoided by using biofuels.

There is also concern that global food prices will be pushed up if farmers find it is more profitable to grow biofuels to replace oil to power cars.

Soaring wheat prices have already forced Hovis to put up the price of its standard loaf from 99p to £1.15.

Doug Parr, chief scientific adviser of Greenpeace, said: "From next month British motorists will be forced to pump biofuels into their tanks with no way of knowing if the so-called green fuels they're using are actually worse for the climate than regular fossil fuels.

"For one of the Government's top scientists to describe these plans as potentially insane suggests that something has gone seriously wrong here.

"The targets should be scrapped. Pressing ahead regardless of the consequences for the climate would be incredibly reckless."

Create a FREE account to continue reading

eros

Registration is a free and easy way to support our journalism.

Join our community where you can: comment on stories; sign up to newsletters; enter competitions and access content on our app.

Your email address

Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number

You must be at least 18 years old to create an account

* Required fields

Already have an account? SIGN IN

By clicking Create Account you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use , Cookie policy and Privacy policy .

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged in