Lord Goldsmith denies overlooking phone hacking claims in 2006

Lord Goldsmith: has denied overlooking phone hacking claims in 2006
12 April 2012

Former attorney general Lord Goldsmith has denied claims that he overlooked widespread allegations of phone hacking in 2006 in favour of a "much narrower" investigation.

Conservative MP Geoffrey Cox told the House of Commons yesterday that the Labour peer had been informed that a "vast array of numbers had been tapped" by private investigators at News International.

He said Lord Goldsmith gave his approval for the police inquiry to focus on News of the World royal reporter Clive Goodman and private detective Glenn Mulcaire, who were later convicted.

Lord Goldsmith told BBC2's Newsnight: "I wasn't told about any of the other allegations. As background in the briefing that I had about those cases (Mulcaire and Goodman), I was told that the police believed there were other cases as well.
"But they were talked about in terms of there being probably further investigations in due course.

"And I think the point to make absolutely plain was that there was never any request to me, still less was there any answer from me, suggesting that the inquiry should be kept narrow.

"I'm not the Metropolitan Police Commissioner and I'm not the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP). I superintend, which is general oversight."

He added: "As to why this wider investigation that was referred to didn't take place, you'll have to ask the police or the DPP Ken Macdonald what they did afterwards.

"It wasn't my responsibility - they didn't ask me for any advice, I didn't give them any advice, that's not what attorney generals do."
Mr Cox made his comments during a debate on public confidence in the media and police.

He asked Home Affairs Committee chairman Keith Vaz: "Did you find as part of your investigation that the Attorney General had been informed in 2006 - on 30 May, to be precise - that a vast array of numbers had been tapped by investigators employed by News International?

"The then attorney general's approval was sought for a much narrower focused investigation, which plainly, by implication, was given.

"Is it not clear that ministers knew in 2006 that there was a great array of tapped phone numbers that could have given rise to a wider investigation, but they never allowed the police, or instructed the police to carry it out?"
Mr Vaz, a Labour MP, replied: "No witness who came before the committee has said that to us."

Create a FREE account to continue reading

eros

Registration is a free and easy way to support our journalism.

Join our community where you can: comment on stories; sign up to newsletters; enter competitions and access content on our app.

Your email address

Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number

You must be at least 18 years old to create an account

* Required fields

Already have an account? SIGN IN

By clicking Create Account you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use , Cookie policy and Privacy policy .

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged in