Inside story of political fallout from Britain's Black Wednesday

13 April 2012
Background to ERM row

Margaret Thatcher, at the urging of her chancellor John Major, took Britain into the ERM in October

1990. The move was an attempt to stave off recession and keep inflation under control by linking the pound to the deutschmark.

But many economists warned that Britain had gone in at too high a rate. Their fears were borne out on 16 September 1992, so-called "Black Wednesday", when speculators made a fortune as the Bank of England tried to prop up the pound.

Interest rates soared to 15 per cent in one day and Britain was forced to pull out of the ERM. Mr Major, by now Prime Minister, and his Chancellor Norman Lamont were humiliated.

Until now, the Treasury has kept secret nine documents drafted in the aftermath of the ERM debacle.

The cost of Black Wednesday

Labour has repeatedly claimed that the fiasco cost ?27billion, a figure repeated in last week's Times in a story leaked by Treasury officials. John Major has insisted the figure is much lower and today's documents back him up.

"The Cost Of Black Wednesday Reconsidered", a paper written on 6 August 1997 by Treasury official Harold Freeman, estimates the Government lost ?800 million in reserves trying to prop up the pound between August and September 1992, with an extra "opportunity cost of ?3.3billion".

Norman Lamont's reputation

Officials reveal that "the position that 'unemployment is a price worth paying', is one that ministers find it difficult to defend". It proves that Mr Lamont's comment, on the need to keep inflation down, had damaged the Government.

The Germans' warnings

One document reveals that the Governor of the German Bundesbank, Karl-Otto P?hl, had told the British ambassador in Bonn in 1989 that he wished Britain had joined the ERM "two or three years previously". Mr P?hl had repeated his view in

September 1990, just before Britain joined, arguing that "it was not possible for countries with three times Germany's inflation rate to join the ERM".

Margaret Thatcher put politics above economics

The Prime Minister had opposed Nigel Lawson's bid to join the ERM but her own declining fortunes over the poll tax made her weak. The papers make clear the decision to join the system was more political than economic.

"Mrs Thatcher's removal of her veto on ERM membership was determined by her own increasing political weakness," an official writes. "October 1990 was clearly not an optimal time for the UK to join the ERM."

The paper adds: "The open warfare between the Chancellor and Prime Minister made it especially difficult for the markets to decide what the objectives of the Government were."

Create a FREE account to continue reading

eros

Registration is a free and easy way to support our journalism.

Join our community where you can: comment on stories; sign up to newsletters; enter competitions and access content on our app.

Your email address

Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number

You must be at least 18 years old to create an account

* Required fields

Already have an account? SIGN IN

By clicking Create Account you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use , Cookie policy and Privacy policy .

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged in