George Osborne criticised by EU over hidden nuclear costs

 
The Commission were critical over the costing of Hinkley Point C by Government (Photo: Peter Macdiarmid/Getty Images)
Mark Leftly27 October 2014

The European Commission has hit out Chancellor George Osborne for failing to reveal all the costs associated with building the UK’s first nuclear power station since the 1990s.

The commission approved the construction of Hinkley Point C on the Somerset coast earlier this month following a state aid investigation.

The Government has agreed that owner EDF would be guaranteed a minimum fee for the electricity produced there, known as the strike price, so that shareholders in the French operator knew they would get a return on the £16bn cost of building the plant.

However, some members of the Commission were critical that the Government has consistently failed to include other long-term costs when valuing Hinkley Point C, the first of a planned fleet of new nuclear reactors that are expected to reduce household bills by £95 in 2030.

Buried deep in commission minutes from 8 October is an admission that there was “regret, expressed by some, that all the long-term costs for the British Treasury had not been integrated into the calculation of the cost of the project, for instance the cost of storing the nuclear waste or of dismantling the plant at the end of its lifetime”.

This meeting involved 22 members of the commission, led by the president, Jose Manuel Barroso, and including the vice-president, Baroness Ashton, from the UK.

Despite the rebuke, they concluded that state aid for the plant, which will heat up to six million homes when it is built by 2023, would not “have any negative impact on the functioning of the market”.

Dr David Lowry, a research consultant and member of Nuclear Waste Advisory Associates, warned that nuclear costs “always escalate” and added: “When ministers and political atomic aficionados back the nuclear industry’s claims that they have covered all future costs for long-term radioactive waste management, they have fallen into a clever trap.”

A Treasury spokesman said: “With respect to the decommissioning and storage costs the situation is that [EDF subsidiary] NNBG are responsible for these long-term costs (through their investment in a Funded Decommissioning Plan), and these costs are all included in the agreed strike price. It is a pity that the minutes do not reflect this.

“As well as being responsible for their costs in cleaning up of the site, NNBG will pay HM Government for the radioactive waste transferred to HM Government for long-term storage.”

Create a FREE account to continue reading

eros

Registration is a free and easy way to support our journalism.

Join our community where you can: comment on stories; sign up to newsletters; enter competitions and access content on our app.

Your email address

Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number

You must be at least 18 years old to create an account

* Required fields

Already have an account? SIGN IN

By clicking Create Account you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use , Cookie policy and Privacy policy .

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged in